Mapping CoP for inclusion: a Knowledge Base

Autores

M. Silveira-Maia, Instituto Politécnico do Porto. Escola Superior de Educação; C. Neto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto. Escola Superior de Educação; M. Sanches-Ferreira, Instituto Politécnico do Porto. Escola Superior de Educação; S. Alves, Instituto Politécnico do Porto. Escola Superior de Educação; H. Durães; C. Breyer; E. Vandenbussche; H. Boonen; Z. Zacharová; Š. Ferková; P. Schukoff; S. Unterreiner; E. Teijsen

Palavras-chave:

student’s agency, inclusive education, interprofessional collaboration, communities of practice

Sinopse

Inclusive education is a collaboration process in which we are continuously challenged to reflect and find solutions. All needs are individualized and dynamic – profoundly connected with the activities and environment that we experience in the classroom and in the school. Starting by the assumption of “not knowing” and that no educator is prepared in advance for inclusive education, in this report we contributed to map and reflect on the importance of developing collaborative and situated learning as a model for professional development for inclusion. This report was developed in the scope of I CO COPE Project- “Inclusion through interprofessional COllaboration in a Community Of Practice in Education (2022-1-BE02-KA220-SCH-000089287)” . The project involved institutions from four European countries – Belgium (Flemish community), Portugal, Austria and Slovakia. The main aim of this Erasmus+ project was to create knowledge on how to make the collaboration processes more transparent, effective and inclusive in terms of including everyone’s voice. As a first step to reach such a goal, a common knowledge was needed to be built around 4 main concepts: 1) Inclusive Education; 2) Interprofessional Collaboration; 3) Students’ Agency and 4) Communities of Practice (CoP).  For that a literature and practice review was conducted to  enable the identification of good practices as well as tools for evaluating and reflecting these four concepts.

Referências

Ainscow, M. (2016). Diversity and Equity: A Global Education Challenge. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 143 - 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-016-0056-x

Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480206069014

Alberto, J., & Herth, K. (2009). Interprofessional Collaboration within Faculty Roles: Teaching, Service, and Research. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol14No02PPT02

Bhugra, D. (2016). Social discrimination and social justice. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(4), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2016.1210359

Borg, E., & Drange, I. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration in school: Effects on teaching and learning. Improving Schools, 22(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219864812

Breyer, C., Lederer, J., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2020). Learning and support assistants in inclusive education: a transnational analysis of assistance services in Europe. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754546

Breyer, C., Wilfling, K., Leitenbauer, C., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2019). The self-efficacy of learning and support assistants in the Austrian inclusive education context. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1706255

Brodén, N. D. (2022), Cross-sector and interprofessional collaborations: A powerful tool for the teaching profession?. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 283, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7144c6ac-en

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychological review, 101(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. (2010). A national interprofessional competency framework. https://www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210.pdf

De BruÏne, E. & Gerdes, J. (2018). Naar de andere oever. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 9-10. https://www.tijdschriftvoororthopedagogiek.nl/110-1137_h1-Naar-de-andere-oever-h1

EASNIE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2015). Agency position on inclusive education systems. EASNIE. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/agency-position-inclusive-education-systems-first-edition

EASNIE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2017). Inclusive Early Childhood Education: New Insights and Tools – Contributions from a European Study. (M. Kyriazopoulou, P. Bartolo, E. Björck-Åkesson, C. Giné and F. Bellour, eds.). Odense, Denmark. https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/IECE_Synthesis_Report_2017.pdf

EASNIE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2019). Inclusive School Leadership: Exploring Policies Across Europe. (E. Óskarsdóttir, V. Donnelly and M. Turner-Cmuchal, eds.). Odense, Denmark. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/inclusive-school-leadership-synthesis

EASNIE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2022). Profile for Inclusive Teacher Professional Learning: Including all education professionals in teacher professional learning for inclusion. (A. De Vroey, A. Lecheval and A. Watkins, eds.). Odense, Denmark. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/TPL4I-profile

EASNIE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2022). Voices into Action: Promoting learner and family participation in educational decision-making. (A. Kefallinou, D.C. Murdoch, A. Mangiaracina and S. Symeonidou, eds.). Odense, Denmark. https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/VIA%20Synthesis-Report.pdf

Edmonds, R. (2019). Making children’s ‘agency’ visible: Towards the localisation of a concept in theory and practice. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860994

Eerdekens, W., Raes, A., Vandenbussche, E. (2017, May). Kinderen in de jeugdhulp: Participatie is meer dan praten. Sociaal.Net. https://sociaal.net/achtergrond/kinderen-in-de-jeugdhulp/

Erstad, O., Miño, R. & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Prácticas educativas para transformar y conectar escuelas y comunidades. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 29(66), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-01

Esteban, M. (2022). Children’s Participation, Progressive Autonomy, and Agency for Inclusive Education in Schools. Social Inclusion, 10(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i2.4936

Estyn. (2016). Pupil participation: a best practice guide. https://www.estyn.gov.wales/thematic-report/pupil-participation-best-practice-guide

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2015). Education and training monitor 2015, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/180281

European Parliament. (2000). Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/s/zLUs

European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on promoting common values, inclusive education, and the European dimension of teaching. (2018). Official Journal, C 195, 1-5. CELEX: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018H0607(01) [legislation]

Fielding, M. (2011). La voz del alumnado y la inclusión educativa: una aproximación democrática radical para el aprendizaje intergeneracional. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 25(1), 31-61. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/274/27419147003.pdf

Fielding, M. (2012). Beyond student voice: Patterns of partnership and the demands of deep democracy. Revista de Educación, 359, 45–65. 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2012-359-195

Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551

Florian, L. (2017). The Heart of Inclusive Education is Collaboration. Pedagogika, 126(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.32

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23077052

Friend, M. (2000). Myths and Misunderstandings About Professional Collaboration. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 130-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100301

Friend, M. (2008). Co-Teaching: A Simple Solution That Isn't Simple After All. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2008.v2n2p9-19

Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-Teaching: An Illustration of the Complexity of Collaboration in Special Education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380

Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. (2007). Evaluating the Imperative of Intraorganizational Collaboration: A School Improvement Perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006296198

Gebhardt, M., Schwab, S., Krammer, M., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2015). General and special education teachers' perceptions of teamwork in inclusive classrooms at elementary and secondary schools. Journal for educational research online, 7, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:11493

González Coto, M. (2012). La agencia de la niña y el niño en la condición pre-ciudadana / Agency childhood in the pre-citizen condition. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v12i2.10287

Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings – a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545

Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future. The Journal of chiropractic education, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-14-36

Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778

Holmqvist, M., & Lelinge, B. (2020). Teachers’ collaborative professional development for inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(5), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1842974

Hynek, K. A., Malmberg-Heimonen, I., & Tøge, A. G. (2020). Improving interprofessional collaboration in Norwegian primary schools: A cluster-randomized study evaluating effects of the LOG model on teachers' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1708281

Kampwirth, T. J. (2006). Collaborative Consultation in the Schools: Effective Practices for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems. 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Kyriazopoulou, M., Weber, H. (Eds.) (2009). Development of a set of indicators – for inclusive education in Europe. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/development-of-a-set-of-indicators-for-inclusive-education-in-europe_Indicators-EN-with-cover.pdf

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis-Dagnell, S., Parsons, S. & Kovshoff, H. (2023). Creative methods developed to facilitate the voices of children and young people with complex needs about their education: A systematic review and conceptual analysis of voice. Educational Research Review, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100529

Little, T. D., Hawley, P. H., Henrich, C. C., & Marsland, K. W. (2002). Three Views of the Agentic Self: A Developmental Synthesis. In Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan (eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research. University of Rochester Press.

Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033

Mellin, E. A. (2009). Unpacking Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Expanded School Mental Health: A Conceptual Model for Developing the Evidence Base. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 2(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2009.9715706

Messiou, K. (2016). Research in the field of inclusive education: time for a rethink?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184

Messiou, K., Ainscow, M., Echeita, G., Goldrick, S., Hope, M., Paes, I., Sandoval, M., Simon, C., Vitorino, T. (2016). Learning from differences: a strategy for teacher development in respect to student diversity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.966726

Molfenter, N. & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (2017). Ethics of Inclusion for Secondary Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the United States. International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, (9), 79-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000009004

Molins i Paronella, A. (2020). L'omnipotència infantil, un problema bioètic. La necessitat i la urgència de repensar l'educació en el marc de l'ètica del cuidar. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, (49), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2020.49.30287

Moriña, A. (2023). Approaches to Inclusive Pedagogy: A Systematic Literature Review. Pedagogika, 140(4), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2020.140.8

Mortier, K. (2018). Communities of Practice: a Conceptual Framework for Inclusion of Students with Significant Disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1461261

Mortier, K., Hunt, P., Leroy, M., Van de Putte, I., & Van Hove, G. (2010). Communities of practice in inclusive education. Educational Studies, 36(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690903424816

Moss, G. (2009). The politics of literacy in the context of large‐scale education reform. Research Papers in Education, 24(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520902867093

Paulsrud, D., & Nilholm, C. (2020). Teaching for inclusion – a review of research on the cooperation between regular teachers and special educators in the work with students in need of special support. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1846799

Porter, G., Epp, L., & Bryan, S. (2000). Collaboration among school mental health professionals: A necessity, not a luxury. Professional School Counseling, 3(5), 315.

Price, H. & Carstens, R. (2020). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 analysis plan. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 220, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7b8f4779-en

Ramberg, J. & Watkins, A. (2020). Exploring inclusive education across Europe: some insights from the European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.32865/fire202061172

Romanian Children’s Board, Children and Experts From the EU. (2019). Bucharest EU children’s declaration. UNICEF Romania. https://www.unicef.org/romania/bucharest-eu-childrens-declaration

Rutkowski, D., L. Rutkowski, J. Bélanger, S. Knoll, K. Weatherby, & E. Prusinski. (2013). Teaching and Learning International Survey TALIS 2013: Conceptual Framework. Final. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. J., & Lopez, S. (2015). Causal Agency Theory: Reconceptualizing a Functional Model of Self-Determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24827508

Silveira-Maia, M. & Santos, M.A. (2020). Ética na investigação em educação inclusiva: conversão dos valores da inclusão para a prática investigativa com crianças e jovens com necessidades adicionais de suporte. In I. Nascimento, P. S. Neto (Eds.), Ensaios sobre ética e investigação em Psicologia e em Educação. Mais Leituras.

Silveira-Maia, M., Alves, S., Aguiar, T., Sanches-Ferreira, M., Beaton, M., Bethere, D., Boonen, H., Callens, S., De Vries, P., Edwards, T., Eerlingen, A., Lofthouse, R., Sergeant, S., Teijsen, E., Touw, H., Ulmane-Ozoliņa, L., Wilssens, M. (2023). Collaborative Learning for Inclusion Under a Magnifying Lens. Porto: Instituto Politécnico do Porto. https://proudtoteachall.eu/en/research-and-policy-recommendations/research-and-policy-recommendations-detail/book-collaborative-learning-for-inclusion-under-a-magnifying-lens?from=

Slee, R. (2018). Defining the scope of inclusive education: think piece prepared for the 2020 Global education monitoring report, Inclusion and education. Paper commissioned for the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report, Inclusion and education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265773

Smith, S., Hayes, S., & Shea, P (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger's Community of Practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000- 2014. Online Learning 21(1), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963

Suc, L., Bukovec, B., & Karpljuk, D. (2017). The role of inter-professional collaboration in developing inclusive education: experiences of teachers and occupational therapists in Slovenia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325073

Sutterlüty, F., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019). Agency, autonomy and self-determination: Questioning key concepts of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860992

Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1163/092755607 X206489

Thompson, S. A. (2007). A Community Just for Practice: A Case of an Inclusive/Special Education Course [Abstract]. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 30(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466631

UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098427

UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. ED-2016/WS/28. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/professional interest/pages/crc.aspx

United Nations. (2009). General comment no. 12 on the right of the child to be heard (CRC/C/GC/12 20 July 2009). https://undocs.org/en/CRC/C/GC/12

Vandenbroeck, M. (2012). Evidence-Based Practice, Professionalism and Respect for Diversity: A Tense Relation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education 6 (1): 1–20. https://www.pecerajournal.com/detail/26922

Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: a systematic review. Teaching and teacher education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001

Walton, E., Carrington, S., Saggers, B., Edwards, C., & Kimani, W. (2019). What matters in learning communities for inclusive education: a cross-case analysis. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689525

Welch, W. J., Robert. J. Buck, Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Mitchell, T. J., & Morris, M. D. (1992). Screening, Predicting, and Computer Experiments. Technometrics, 34(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269548

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut. Ivey Business Journal. http://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/knowledge-management-as-a-doughnut/

Wenger, E. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. University of Winsconsin-Madison, Office of Human Resources. https://www.ohr.wisc.edu/cop/articles/communities_practice_intro_wenger.pdf

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & William Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

WHO (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office within the World Health Organisation Department of Human Resources for Health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice

Winitzky, N., Sheridan, S., Crow, N., Welch, M., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Variations on a theme. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487195046002005

Zmuda, A. (2015). Personalized learning. In Alan M. Blankstein, Pedro Noguera & Lorena Kelly (eds.), Excellence through equity: Five principles of courageous leadership to guide achievement for every student. ASD.

A imagem apresenta a capa de um documento relacionado ao projeto Erasmus+ intitulado "I CO-COPE: Inclusion through Interprofessional Collaboration in a Community of Practice in Education". O título do documento é "Mapping CoP for inclusion: a Knowledge Base". O período do projeto é de 01/08/2023 a 31/07/2026, e o número do projeto é 2022-1-BE02-KA220-SCH-000089287.  Na parte superior da imagem, há um logótipo estilizado com as letras "COPE" sobrepostas em diferentes cores. Abaixo do título e da descrição do projeto, há logótipos de várias instituições e parceiros envolvidos, incluindo a União Europeia, Universidade do Porto e outras entidades. O documento também indica que é cofinanciado pela União Europeia. A estética do documento inclui linhas verticais coloridas ao lado direito, combinando tons de azul, vermelho e laranja.

Downloads

Publicado

2025

Licença

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.